Cuz it's late and it couldn't be taken back..
What's the motivation?
AL. claims that his posts were too "TMI." A famous historian didn't elaborate, but apparently was convinced by the lie that Stray informed him of--Ryu caught a lie. Stray seems to think he was avoiding them and trying to sneakily vote them. I'm not sure about Gambit.
There ia not motivation, they just feel the wagon. Oh my god, I love that rhyme.. It's only a matter of utilizing time..
Why didn't you vote yesterday if this is what you felt?
Just having to read back on day 1 you said where was an outed scum and Stray said Ryu caught Trafalgar and Rej lying and your vote looked like you voted Trafalgar after Stray quoted you and you never mentioned Trafalgar was scummy.
...
Let's see Waindo and Juliet got modblocked for lack of posts which of course doesn't mean they're town but my impression is that they would've at least got the minimum post if they weren't
I did. He implied I had no friends. Which is wrong. His passive aggressive stance led me to believe he was scum
I agree with this. A town mislynch on D1 always has at least one scum on the wagon.
As someone who was highly suspected last dp I have no idea why someone would attack you and why another wpuld even waste a heal on you, this is worse.
as far as I can remember he usually sticks with this attitude when he is scum
why is this giving me 3rd/ indeendent vibes ?
I was right on Law, I knew it, I understand this could be seen as if I am scum and actually know better than mere townies but ehhh it was a bit more clearer to me that he is town considering our group chat just pike the case with you and AL, I see neither much contribution from him here other than a push on Law who was clean in my eyes nor his usual play. I am not fully trusting you either, you vouch for him, ok I won’t be on his back until further notice.
Because you ain’t part of the cool kids.
Ah, so it was for no good reason like I thought.
What is it about their styles that's making you suspicious of them this game?
What does that tell you about them?
There is always a motivation for an action. Was it to save someone, was it to put an easy vote into the board? Who do you think amongst them was "feeling" the wagon?
Why wouldn't a vig attack a highly suspected person? Why did you assume it must be scum?
Oh that's good to hear. What do you think about him?
Lol what is with AL & I in your group chat discussions? What do you think was scummy about his push on Law, couldn't have been a mistaken townie? Even though I voted Nessos, I suspected Law a little bit as well and I'm definitely town lol.
There is likely a scum among that group. A D1 mislynch usually features one. Though it becomes a debate of "whose reason was worst?" I think the relevant question is "who was in the middle the most?" The pusher is likely to not be scum because they naturally come under suspicion for being scum, but the weakest reasoner is likely to be seen as sheeping scum, which makes it unlikely on their end as well. So I believe that the Goldilocks zone is what we're looking for here. Of course, we have to take general reads into consideration as well.