[FIN] Traditional Mafia Round 2 - Case Closed

[Rej]

Sure, but we scratch out Wai and add you instead.

But then we can't scratch out Wai.
And if you throw shades at me you still keep attention on you. Dunno what you try to do.
"Sacrificing a maf to lynch off Rej" - worth it 2k19

And you asked for no discussion so you can't slip.

 

[Kibi]

When you rely on fluff as evidence for misdirection... You're not leaving my sights
[automerge]1571912822[/automerge]

Okay Kibi fucked up this DP. Lol.

We have Wai/GU/Kibi/AFH that quitly are suspicious. Either from posts or by nature.

Nope... Saying Wai is always the scummiest with the :datea emoji isn't "jumping on Wai"

You think I'm pushing you? What if I'm just "mild reaction fishing"

Convenient how you ignore this post I made thereafter.

You see how our perception can be deceptive and misleading?

Even Wai got to understand I wasn't pushing his case... What's up Rej, you tried to form that wagon pretty hastily my man?

 

[Rej]

When you rely on fluff as evidence for misdirection... You're not leaving my sights
[automerge]1571912822[/automerge]

Nope... Saying Wai is always the scummiest with the :datea emoji isn't "jumping on Wai"
Convenient how you ignore this post I made thereafter.
Even Wai got to understand I wasn't pushing his case... What's up Rej, you tried to form that wagon pretty hastily my man?

What's up Kibi? I am just reaction fishing. But I don't do it mildly like you and Waindo.

Also what wagon are you hallucinating about?

 

[Waindo]

Your explanation on why do you find me scummy is nonsense lol Rej. Your demeanor is starting to look very forceful, you're truly adding yourself to the sus list with this no joke there.

 

[Rej]

Your explanation on why do you find me scummy is nonsense lol Rej. Your demeanor is starting to look very forceful, you're truly adding yourself to the sus list with this no joke there.

K so this is your ultimate case against me?

vote lynch Waindo @Nana

Lock it please

 

[Kibi]

What's up Kibi? I am just reaction fishing. But I don't do it mildly like you and Waindo.

Also what wagon are you hallucinating about?

This Wagon

Okay Kibi fucked up this DP. Lol.

We have Wai/GU/Kibi/AFH that quitly are suspicious. Either from posts or by nature.

 

[Rej]

This Wagon

I ask you a last time what wagon???

 

[Shottie]

There's a wagon to hitch up to?

 

[Kibi]

I ask you a last time what wagon???

Speedwagon

Okay enough fluff, I found you jumping to the conclusion 'Kibi fucked up' based on almost nothing as trying to start a fire out of nothing but since you said it's reaction fishing... Well I still find it weird but I'd let it go for now

So, will you mind breaking your case on Wai.. Cuz my reads on him are null right now

 

[Rej]

Speedwagon

Okay enough fluff, I found you jumping to the conclusion 'Kibi fucked up' based on almost nothing as trying to start a fire out of nothing but since you said it's reaction fishing... Well I still find it weird but I'd let it go for now

So, will you mind breaking your case on Wai.. Cuz my reads on him are null right now

I just commented your play there and it will come back to you but not from my side

Yeah sec (mobile).

Simmer down Udell, as I said it's day 1, my so called soft push on Rej is more of a joke then serious pushing. Mild reaction fishing-sure, pushing anyones lynch this early on-no, it would be bad for town.

Reads on GU and Drago? Lol, we can have genuine reads this early on? You can? Cuz I can't.
[automerge]1571903280[/automerge]

Now you're the one that's pushing, and those are not facts, you obviously haven't played a lot of games with me.

First of all I tried to calm down the situation with Wai and I asked myself what's wrong about having a scumread in the backhand? But Waindo's main statements were:
"Dont engage me in discussion else I might slip"
"Rej is scummy because he started to post"

I think there is nothing wrong with genuine early reads. If you are a genuine player you are open up to your mind and don't mind speaking freely what's on your thoughts.

I dislike how "mildly reaction fishing" became a term here. This is a scumtell because only scummy people tend to cover their carefullyness behind such phrases.

And to the later par4 again:

Pulling someone into discussion is a civtell and avoiding the discussion is a scumtell. Lol.
You rly have a bad day and maybe a bad role

I whipped the floor with him and AL recently so the only way for them to get rid off me is going for lucky early pushes to attack my credibility or killing me N1.

In the game where Wai was town, Wai played way too benign and careful early.

But I am sick or tired of lynching Wai D1.
I mark him as bad for now.

I already had my main read here. This was me saying "lets cooperate but I still read you as bad".

You know what came after that.

 

[Shottie]

Alright.... can y'all stop with all this angle shooting y'all are attempting to do? It's sloppy and is adding absolutely nothing to the day's conversation. Y'all are just circle jerking each other and saying the same things but in different tones back to each other and honestly all the posts that y'all have made can be ignored and nothing is missed.

What should be the focus is people who are not posting, or are trying to hide and be ignored. Or people who have not met post requirements though their earliest posts indicate they've had plenty of time to make responses.

 

[Rej]

Alright.... can y'all stop with all this angle shooting y'all are attempting to do? It's sloppy and is adding absolutely nothing to the day's conversation. Y'all are just circle jerking each other and saying the same things but in different tones back to each other and honestly all the posts that y'all have made can be ignored and nothing is missed.

What should be the focus is people who are not posting, or are trying to hide and be ignored. Or people who have not met post requirements though their earliest posts indicate they've had plenty of time to make responses.

That's another reason why my vote is on Wai. I wanted to move forward by calling out suspects and move forward. I see nothing wrong with it as I can ecplain for myself and to others what I think.

The problem are non voters and lowlayer as you said at this stage it's dangerous.

Also what the heck been angle-shooting up there? We just try to collect meta reads if noone else is there.

 

[Kibi]

I just commented your play there and it will come back to you but not from my side

Yeah sec (mobile).

First of all I tried to calm down the situation with Wai and I asked myself what's wrong about having a scumread in the backhand? But Waindo's main statements were:
"Dont engage me in discussion else I might slip"
"Rej is scummy because he started to post"

I think there is nothing wrong with genuine early reads. If you are a genuine player you are open up to your mind and don't mind speaking freely what's on your thoughts.

I dislike how "mildly reaction fishing" became a term here. This is a scumtell because only scummy people tend to cover their carefullyness behind such phrases.

And to the later par4 again:

I already had my main read here. This was me saying "lets cooperate but I still read you as bad".

You know what came after that.

Okay I see, This was what I meant when I said Wai is always the scummiest, interfering with reads.
Right now he seems pretty mad about your suspicion on him. Whether it's coming from trauma of being lynched D1 or Actual scum.
But I think slowly we're narrowing down on targets for lynch.

Gambit's play is reminding me of his scum meta, drop in online, insinuate stuff and phase out. Getting a slight scum read. What do you think?
[automerge]1571916139[/automerge]

Alright.... can y'all stop with all this angle shooting y'all are attempting to do? It's sloppy and is adding absolutely nothing to the day's conversation. Y'all are just circle jerking each other and saying the same things but in different tones back to each other and honestly all the posts that y'all have made can be ignored and nothing is missed.

What should be the focus is people who are not posting, or are trying to hide and be ignored. Or people who have not met post requirements though their earliest posts indicate they've had plenty of time to make responses.

Its definitely a problem but you can't really interact with people who aren't here. And it's D1 you can't really single out someone as scum for laying low. Chances are you're likely to hit town rather than scum. So we make do with the actives we have here.

 

[Rej]

Okay I see, This was what I meant when I said Wai is always the scummiest, interfering with reads.
Right now he seems pretty mad about your suspicion on him. Whether it's coming from trauma of being lynched D1 or Actual scum.
But I think slowly we're narrowing down on targets for lynch.

Gambit's play is reminding me of his scum meta, drop in online, insinuate stuff and phase out. Getting a slight scum read. What do you think?
[automerge]1571916139[/automerge]

Its definitely a problem but you can't really interact with people who aren't here. And it's D1 you can't really single out someone as scum for laying low. Chances are you're likely to hit town rather than scum. So we make do with the actives we have here.

I'd wish to find someone scummier than Wai. It would make me glad at this moment.

I want more from @Okosan he ain't getting a free pass like last game. Now he has to struggle his way to win.

And yes @Gambit is one of those who gave fuel to the Wai case.

 

[Waindo]

We basically haven't seen anything from anyone other than 4-5 of us which tried to get some reactions from one another. And I think that we don't have much of the day phase left

We need to hear thoughts of these guys, the quiet ones are always gonna have a scum among them, pointing fingers at these ppl - >

@Okosan
@Fire Tiger
@Hatz
@Naomi
@A famous historian
[automerge]1571919588[/automerge]
@Zemmi
@Bonnibel

Also not a zilch from you guys. Cccc.

Basically half of the roster hasn't said anything at all.

 

[Deleted member 4]

We basically haven't seen anything from anyone other than 4-5 of us which tried to get some reactions from one another. And I think that we don't have much of the day phase left

We need to hear thoughts of these guys, the quiet ones are always gonna have a scum among them, pointing fingers at these ppl - >

@Okosan
@Fire Tiger
@Hatz
@Naomi
@A famous historian
[automerge]1571919588[/automerge]
@Zemmi
@Bonnibel

Also not a zilch from you guys. Cccc.

Basically half of the roster hasn't said anything at all.

I have nothing to say at the moment but when I do, no worries I will.

 

[Waindo]

Okay I see, This was what I meant when I said Wai is always the scummiest, interfering with reads.
Right now he seems pretty mad about your suspicion on him. Whether it's coming from trauma of being lynched D1 or Actual scum.
But I think slowly we're narrowing down on targets for lynch.

Gambit's play is reminding me of his scum meta, drop in online, insinuate stuff and phase out. Getting a slight scum read. What do you think?
[automerge]1571916139[/automerge]

Its definitely a problem but you can't really interact with people who aren't here. And it's D1 you can't really single out someone as scum for laying low. Chances are you're likely to hit town rather than scum. So we make do with the actives we have here.

I beg to differ, especially when the ones that are laying low (not all of them) are lurking online.

 

[Bonnibel]

I don't like the fact that Waindo said that reads this early on don't matter in response to Kibi pointing out how Waindo was "interfering with reads" when Udell said he was the "scummiest so far." Seems like a weak defense and disregarding what Udell said ?‍

 

[Rej]

Juliet always wants us to read her by entrance posts = bad

Zemmi is idealess (?) = bad

GU had fluffdynamics with Gambit (bad) and Juliet = bad

Gambit plays like Arso giving fuel to something = bad

Just some gun to head reads related to earlier posts

 

[Waindo]

Weak defense against false and forced, premmature, non-readable fluff, pinball accusations Bon.
[automerge]1571920111[/automerge]
Good to see you so suddenly on Bon btw, any reads btw?

@Rej I have a bad hunch about Jules as well, especially after that apologetic first post.