- Messages
- 15,326
- Reaction score
- 45,313
- Points
- 33,800
- Salty Doubloons
- 629
-
-
-
Woah woah woah.. I am entitled to have a black tea.. It's pretty cheap after all. La brava, get them legs for me to break. Gentle criminal is here..
@joby @Nessos my buddies, we are being handed over to the plot of the phase. It's interesting! I guess we are buddies? Lmao.
Kidding aside.
In both of your statements, it appears that you assumed that a fun act between two players is alrdy a lock in buddies?
You wanted somebody to correct you on that? Then why laid it all that way if you're not the one in position to capitalize on something?
You are telling me that there was no inconsistencies with your posts but the way you address them is only accumulates to the inconsistencies.. This only started when I question you why you think Ona's early reads are TMi when you in fact gave out your own early reads.. Lmao. And you felt attacked henceforth. And became somewhat defensive. Being defensive is no issue for me.. Being inconsistent is something. And that's is where i am coming from.. Do i scum read you? There's not a single line that would tell that i did. It's only interogation.
[automerge]1587042180[/automerge]
[automerge]1587042280[/automerge]
And I think the term upset is not fitting. Are u certain you're not twisting me? I would rather say, reacting in such a way that i can endorse you're calling out wrong? In short, responsive.
@joby @Nessos my buddies, we are being handed over to the plot of the phase. It's interesting! I guess we are buddies? Lmao.
Kidding aside.
Quite quick there. Could expound on that.
Hhmm. I don't think so. Never did I in any of my posts lies a dark agenda. There's no secret behind it. What's bothering me is how you wanted to juice something from my cute interaction with Joby.
In both of your statements, it appears that you assumed that a fun act between two players is alrdy a lock in buddies?
You wanted somebody to correct you on that? Then why laid it all that way if you're not the one in position to capitalize on something?
The thing is, I am yet to read you. There's really nothing of substance behind your posts to address your alignment at this point. Would wanna hear more from you.Nope, gambit just really really likes the way it feels to type out the word “town”
Also I think he is more referring to the fact that I’m read as scum and pressured early on pretty much 100% of the games I play here now.
Sometimes I don’t do the best job of explaining my thoughts and feelings but I’m trying to do better
[automerge]1587015659[/automerge]
It’s 1:40am here see y’all in the morning
Thank you number 2.Because you are the number 1 Player Here you have to be scum
Are u tryna solicit a wagon right here? At least, state the facts in which you view me as scum.. For.what i understand, you are tryna leverage on the interaction stray and i are having and inquest an idea to fashion into people's head thereby?
What in the fuck you are calling us out? First, I don't see Becky buddying Michelle. However, I see the latter soliciting a wagon from the former. That's a different setting. For Ona, he has a strong opener and gave us a roll in this game. A decent kick off. He gave his reads and scum reads me which he explained why.. Becky didn't jump on it but Michelle. So to itemize that, I am singling out both becky and ona in that equation and question michelle how she arrived into that conclusion. I guess it's a pretty good opportunity for her to explain.
I am curious just how you want people to come and also paint me as scum and yet you aren't too certain with your prejudging. That's terrible act. Rather weak than stray tryna get away with the fact that she was really inconsistent with her post. Lmao
Enlighten me on the line of questioning a town should put on the parchments?
You are telling me that there was no inconsistencies with your posts but the way you address them is only accumulates to the inconsistencies.. This only started when I question you why you think Ona's early reads are TMi when you in fact gave out your own early reads.. Lmao. And you felt attacked henceforth. And became somewhat defensive. Being defensive is no issue for me.. Being inconsistent is something. And that's is where i am coming from.. Do i scum read you? There's not a single line that would tell that i did. It's only interogation.
I am quite bothered with how you ignored the inconsistencies.. Hhmm. Explain.
[automerge]1587042180[/automerge]
Lol you miss me?@Gambit how about you show some contribution since you were so upset when I accused you of not contributing? Give us some input and reads.
[automerge]1587041740[/automerge]
Don't forget we're apparently buddies ganging up on him.
[automerge]1587042280[/automerge]
And I think the term upset is not fitting. Are u certain you're not twisting me? I would rather say, reacting in such a way that i can endorse you're calling out wrong? In short, responsive.
