General RP General Chat

Oreki

Oreki

Messages
5,349
Reaction score
21,907
Points
16,150
Salty Doubloons
2,479
kakashi19283 said:
On the topic of all of this technique rank talk, can we bring the conversation back to how not every shit technique should be allowed to be S+ and that GMs should be the ones to rank techniques?
Click to expand...
It can be something like that "He made a casual swing" that shit shouldn't be S+ rank but "He put his all strength in that swing" should be S+ rank

Like saying casual sounds cocky
 
Kaka

Kaka

Messages
12,100
Reaction score
29,371
Points
29,550
Salty Doubloons
3,847
Oreki said:
They allowed it, they approved it, they told us. Just because they forget to upgrade that doesn't mean it should be there.


I don't understand this logic, if Nero already has mastered Haki, his swordsmanship, and anything else why he shouldn't be able to have blackblade
Click to expand...
Because the black blade has nothing to do with your own Haki specifically. If Mihawk lets go of the Yoru or someone else grabs it it won't suddenly become non-black.

Not every sword is black, just because someone strong wields it. Whitebeard's Bisento is a top 12 and he is obviously all-powerful and his blade wasn't black. Neither was Roger's. Only certain swords become black and they're special, as said canonically in the manga.

Nobody is saying that you can't actively imbue your sword with Haki and turn it black But it's not a permanent black sword.
[automerge]1608130106[/automerge]
Ebuk said:
I can't wait to get my 300 millions beri lol
Click to expand...
I can't wait to get my 2 bill that's waiting to be cleared. xD
 
Ziosa

Ziosa

Salutations
Messages
7,146
Reaction score
24,725
Points
22,700
Salty Doubloons
10,803
a perk in my mind isnt a good reward, as most players would want more unique ones and you can only have two; plus you would need to buy the store thing to change it to that perk anyway
Oreki said:
They allowed it, they approved it, they told us. Just because they forget to upgrade that doesn't mean it should be there.
Click to expand...
things change, and if its not officially in a patch; why would it be added
kakashi19283 said:
On the topic of all of this technique rank talk, can we bring the conversation back to how not every shit technique should be allowed to be S+ and that GMs should be the ones to rank techniques?

Cause I'm still not over the bs of ''I swing my sword vertically downward'' being an S+ technique lol.
Click to expand...
people would just find ways to write techniques in a S+ rank way, it doesnt really solve much aside from restricting things and making things more awkward. There should be some filler/flavour that makes it seem vaguely powerful at least though lol
Frayz said:
a question, if I'm using my 'shadow limbs' at a distance but they're still physically connecting with an enemy like Robin's fruit. Is that still close combat?
Click to expand...
cursed weapon MA are a gray area with this, plus they cant go to 120 anyway; they get spirit break instead
 
Kaka

Kaka

Messages
12,100
Reaction score
29,371
Points
29,550
Salty Doubloons
3,847
Oreki said:
It can be something like that "He made a casual swing" that shit shouldn't be S+ rank but "He put his all strength in that swing" should be S+ rank

Like saying casual sounds cocky
Click to expand...
See that's where I disagree. You putting your whole strength behind it is a strength thing, not a mastery thing. You putting your whole strength behind it is what allows you to be in the 120 strength DPR bracket. The techniques take it from there.

By your logic, there would be no point to even ranking techniques, as any technique could be S+ as long as you claim you put your whole strength behind it. lol
 
The Fool

The Fool

Messages
11,159
Reaction score
38,426
Points
29,500
Salty Doubloons
235
With rules changing and shit can I go back to my dark gorey self again that even cross was like wtf about? :kermithesith:
 
Oreki

Oreki

Messages
5,349
Reaction score
21,907
Points
16,150
Salty Doubloons
2,479
kakashi19283 said:
See that's where I disagree. You putting your whole strength behind it is a strength thing, not a mastery thing. You putting your whole strength behind it is what allows you to be in the 120 strength DPR bracket. The techniques take it from there.

By your logic, there would be no point to even ranking techniques, as any technique could be S+ as long as you claim you put your whole strength behind it. lol
Click to expand...
Then mastery is about how flawlessly you handle that sword and you can't describe that from attack description.

During marineford war Mihawk every casual average swing was destroying ice mountains and so on. Deciding based on description is stupid then. No offense.
 
The Fool

The Fool

Messages
11,159
Reaction score
38,426
Points
29,500
Salty Doubloons
235
Ziosa said:
they arent changing, they are being clarified lol
Click to expand...
I meant going Berserk level with no limits that level of gore and darkness

Going into detail how I behead a character as an example

Slicing a child's finger off and ripping and jerking a limb off the child and setting him or her on fire
 
Kaka

Kaka

Messages
12,100
Reaction score
29,371
Points
29,550
Salty Doubloons
3,847
Ziosa said:
people would just find ways to write techniques in a S+ rank way, it doesnt really solve much aside from restricting things and making things more awkward. There should be some filler/flavour that makes it seem vaguely powerful at least though lol
Click to expand...
Then at least limit how many S+ rank techniques ppl can have. That way they on their own will be encouraged to only give that rank to their special techniques. Otherwise, everything is S+, what's the point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom