Oh, I didn't know about that one. That's convenient.My bad, wanted to link the iso post tool which Drago mentioned. I didn't realize that it's unlinkable.
![]()
Oh, I didn't know about that one. That's convenient.My bad, wanted to link the iso post tool which Drago mentioned. I didn't realize that it's unlinkable.
![]()
I am talking about this post:What did I cherry pick? I talked about the entire post didn't I? I didn't cherry pick or take anything out of context. How many times must I repeat myself about this? Sigh. I know how Gambit feels now.
Michelle's reasoning, there, pretty clear.@Dragomir
breaking the quote to explain:
1. We are playing mafia This is a game but each day we pretend we lynch a person. This is making the game deadly serious. When an interaction is too friendly something is off when there is nothing else than pleasantries. If soemone points this out in any way you shouldn't be bothred by him showing your own fluff behaviour while you admit it. It's like deflecting attention from it which scum often are doing.
2. I think this is clear, I said that he exaggerated when he said what I assumed.
Town has a more prudent approach or a more direct one. Gambit was just twisting my words to shade me.
3. Gambit didn't answer at this iirc, and also i don't think him ignoring my willingness to understand correct his posts shows a towny mindset from him.
4. He doesn't ask what my intention is, he directly comes with the idea I was trying to solicit a wagon on him. I never called anyone to join me. I only asked for reads from other players.
Scum want to show a townie has 'scum behaviour' even if this is a fake thought.
5. Here Gambit was redirecting the convo in other direction, to Cat for whom I had and still have a TR, and I noticed that often scum have the tendency to link themselves to a townie. So if my read on Cat is right, Gambit has to be scum from this imo.
Also he says I am insinuating things, but in fact he is the one doing this.
6. Saying my play is an act is another shade btw... I thought that his conclusions comes not from what I said but from his need to push his narrative.
the lmao thing is a scummy fake joyful mood, put there to show fake relaxation but doesn't really match with the meaning of the post, so I take it as a scum claim tbh.
You never found scum by spotting fake wanna be aggreable tone?
I think this is clear and shows in tl;dr my reasons to vote.
the above shows you my thought process.
I still think Gambit is scum, but i have the idea of what if I am biased in any way and Ona was right for reading him town at Eod.
Idk what to do and I need more content from Gambit. After all Ona is human and he can make a mistake and I need to understand the truth here.
Whos reads?Coooooo! (Obviously Okosan does agree with a couple of your reads you have on that scale of yours, but again Okosan could just be missing stuff so it's hard to say. Okosan doesn't normally sub into games because he doesn't like having to catch up so)
[automerge]1587333830[/automerge]
COOOO! (But yeah generally it seems like whatever. Not a super scummy post on its own)
Cooooooo! (Talking about Drago's post that was linked)Whos reads?
Wait, Drago called out Michelle as scum over this post of hers?I am talking about this post:
Michelle's reasoning, there, pretty clear.
You on the other hand base your entire argument on...what exactly? Your Town read on Gambit? What if Michelle is Town and right about Gambit? You aren't considering the possibility she could be Town and Gambit scum or both can be Town. So tell me who is tunneling now?
No, but he is constantly referring to other posts when this post right there shows perfect reasoning and he somehow ignores that. He doesn't have an open mind regarding her either. She perfectly explained her line of thought. She isn't even doing TMI since she still considers I could be scum, too. She. Is. Town.Wait, Drago called out Michelle as scum over this post of hers?
Flower................I have stated multiple times that I did not see that post when I was making my read on Mich. How many times must I repeat this?!I am talking about this post:
Michelle's reasoning, there, pretty clear.
You on the other hand base your entire argument on...what exactly? Your Town read on Gambit? What if Michelle is Town and right about Gambit? You aren't considering the possibility she could be Town and Gambit scum or both can be Town. So tell me who is tunneling now?
)Yeah, then you should maybe reevaluate your reads? This post doesn't affect them or anything? Your tunneling gets you nowhere. And I'm speaking from experience.Flower................I have stated multiple times that I did not see that post when I was making my read on Mich. How many times must I repeat this?!
I am convinced that you never once read my post. I never once said shit about Gambit when talking about Michelle. My scum read on her has nothing to do with my Gambit town read. If Mich is town and Gambit it mafia then I was wrong. Simple. You're trying this horseshit about "not considering the possibility of them being town" again? The same shit you used against me in the Wano game in which I was town? Why do I need to consider her being town? What good will that do to me besides make me a fence sitter? Like, say I said that Michelle could town, is that supposed to change my scum read on her?
All 3 of you are huh.That's what you get from tunneling, Drago. I'm getting the feeling your entire reasoning is just down the roof and turned into big tunnel vision.
...
Yeah, folks, Drago is Town for this.
Drago is Town, Michelle is Town, I am Town. Lock this.
Uh-oh you're up to the interesting part.Coooo! Coooo! (Okay Okosan will be back in about an hour or so, and when he gets back he'll read through the rest of Waindo's posts, ans well as all the posts since that one post of Drago's.... then Okosan will probably vote Waindo for being outed scum)
COOOOO! (Okosan will say he's not sure how to feel about Ted (Okosan's other main scum read) pushing Waindo as well, though)
Yeah, so this was just a big TvTvT. But it helps narrow down suspects for sure.All 3 of you are huh.
Isn't that interesting.
From your past 15 posts 10 are 'vote for Waindo', 'wagon Waindo' and paraphrases of that.Vote waindo, drago
I mean, of course you would disagree with what I say, since what I'm saying is you're scum.I do not agree with what Shottie just said. Juliet is maybe one of the few players that I don't have any vendetta, personal matter, history, affairs, pointless arguments anything of that sort, we have played some games together but never really have argued or have conflicted reads, we have been pretty neutral to each other in every game. This may be the first game I had an argument with Juliet.

She was my strongest scum lean last DP, are you the type who doesn't go for her strongest scum lean? Also, of course, you would say that when you don't even know what history you're talking aboutI mean, of course you would disagree with what I say, since what I'm saying is you're scum.
You guys don't argue or have conflict, you just target her 1st in every game.
You know your case on her last DP was weak, so weak that the only reason why you pop this dp as my scum #1 is because juliet was the one lynched and you were the one hard pushing for her the whole dP when there were SEVERAL other choices, including your focus for this dp Drago and Poison/wai.