Gambit ISO:
aloha! i have yet to watch this movie so I could come up with pretty good fake claims ehem reads...
This is not a bad post but it is something to keep in mind and I will. while reading it I got confused with your WG post for a moment tbh. I mentioned this so that I remember it well for the future.
I noticed Rej quickly jumped on Juliet. Fascinating
Interesting how you accuse him and
Vote Rej
Vote Juliet
Vote beky
do this instantly. with no reasons whatsoever.
Good thing u asked. I just find your entrance scummy. I actually read Rej as scummier tha you.
On getting asked by Juliet you indeed do give a reason but can it be called a reason at all, to place a vote and to accuse someone else, specially when the momentum of the thread is kinda already scum reading juliet? It can easily be a scum blending in or trying to distance scumbuddy.
For the few games Juliet is not Juliet anymore.
[automerge]1596849073[/automerge]
*past few games
this thing makes me think on you and juliet being a scum together makes some sense. for it's a slight defending.
Kinda scummy I guess. What do u think of Juliet?
you flipflop here again.
so overall I do not like your progression, although I did hear that your play is somewhat similar to alice but I cannot see that at all. Your posts are rather readable and I am able to see a scummy progression, though there's not much that makes you scum independently as of now, but mostly your interaction with Juliet, even if Juliet is not a scum herself, you can be one, for you tried the following :
-blending in.
-naked votes.
-poor reasons.
-also bad vibes which aren't post specific.
in short, you are scummy.
[automerge]1596880700[/automerge]
Juliet ISO:
Not sure if I'm reading the game mechanics right or not. It looks like whoever becomes the observers are the ones who decides on the lynch during the trial. The game mechanic looks a bit scum sided since scum can all just privately vote the same player for observer. Maybe that should also be a good way to catch one of the scum for whoever gets privately selected as one of the three observers.
well, i was just "kek"ing about it that whoever posts long post as their opening, are generally scums. but who knows?
coming to the content. That might just be the case, but I doubt Oreki would let that happen, although I'm not sure, but last game, even though it was nothing like this, but there scum couldn't do some thing. uh can't explain it it's way too long.
so basically, that can be the case, can't trust oreki's mind as of now.
From my experience it is scum who accuse players for writing a paragraph.
Nessos pretty much said this on #104.
you know what's the problem with this post is? #104 is not posted by Nessos at all. It was larsi. and Nessos's post didn't say that, at least not what you said as a reason, yours seems a bit TMI.
How could you forget this game started when you signed up and logged in to play this game?
is angleshooting even allowed?
I am figuring out if this was a slip since this is something I have caught scum say something like this before. Like for example scum will submit a night action and then when the day phase starts they log in and say they forgot the day started but there is no way they could forget the game started when they submitted an action during the night. Now in this game we all had to confirm for the game to start but there is no way a player could forget a game started after confirming in their role pm.
well, this is pure assumptions. I don't know what to make out of your post tbh. It's good that you are thinking. but you are overthinking. tbh paranoid town overthinks and scum with no leads overthink. I'm yet to come to a conclusion on which list I should place you.
How is questioning players weird? Questioning players and engaging with them is part of scum hunting and if a player is not going to do that then it just means they are not solving the player in good faith.
this is a good post. not necessarily towny or scummy but a good post.
Maybe I should just claim if I'm the one who's going to be sent to trial and I have the most votes. I also don't trust the players who voted me since the votes were really weak and shaky.
Bad post. although I read later that you do that (?) but claiming in a role madness is suicidal. and if you are indeed town, a mislynch/NK of any town is bad for the town altogether. and if you are scum, this is how you should play actually so clap clap.
I asked what was the reasoning behind the votes since they were empty and naked votes and I don't like those kind of votes since I always find them scummy. If you're talking about panicking over a vote scum don't need to panic over a vote since they can easily tell their scum buddies in the scum chat to coordinate votes.
Sometimes I feel like as if no matter what I post questioning players they will ignore me. I asked Gambit a question and he never answered my question and he is being dodgy and evasive, Hayumi's play is also weird and I was getting a bit of shade throwing vibe from them and they made a wifom post, and Rej never came back.
okay I would like to see a full list of yours and specifically what you think of my post about Gambit when I have mentioned you in it as well.
Okay so Juliet is not "that" scummy as she was targeted by others. I do not see why she was an universal scum read. most of her posts are pretty null or NAI .or is it some sort of a meta that tells everyone that she is scum?
this is a slot I won't town read but with what I see I can find her null or scummy with Gambit progression somehow. I dont know. I'm confused with her.
